On 5/19/2014 9:49 PM, Wang Weijun wrote:
> After some discussion with mit and heimdal lead engineers, I don't want to
> support ms at the moment. mit does not use kdc_timeout at all and heimdal's
> internal presentation is of seconds.
>
> So this is my plan: support "s" but if unspecified treat it as "ms". There
> will be a release notes describing this. This won't automatically fix the
> case for the bug reporter but at least give him a workaround -- use the 's'
> unit for interop.
>
+1
Xuelei
> Does this sound clean?
>
> Thanks
> Max
>
> On May 18, 2014, at 23:12, Xuelei Fan <xuelei....@oracle.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>> On May 18, 2014, at 9:48 PM, chris...@zoulas.com wrote:
>>>
>>> On May 18, 10:06am, weijun.w...@oracle.com (Wang Weijun) wrote:
>>> -- Subject: Re: RFR 8036779: sun.security.krb5.KdcComm interprets
>>> kdc_timeout
>>>
>>> | How about this? I will support "s" and "ms" units ("ms" is not defined by
>>> o=
>>> | ther vendors though). But will still try to be a little smart when there
>>> is=
>>> | no unit.
>>>
>>> Heuristics can make the situation worse; they are difficult to document
>>> and explain to users. But if java is going to support ms, let's coordinate
>>> with heimdal and mit to make them support it too.
>>>
>> +1
>>
>> Xuelei
>>
>>> christos
>>>
>
