Hi Guys, Recently, we noticed that JEP-140 has altered the behavior of AccessControlContext equality and comparson semantics. To be more precisely, AccessControlContext.equals() takes fields "DomainCombiner combiner" & "ProtectionDomain[] context" and some others into consideration (both Java 7 & 8) whereas AccessControlContext.hashCode() only cares about "ProtectionDomain[] context". This is weird.
My questions are: 1. Though spec doesn't require two objects with same hashcode are equal, what's the particular reason that field "DomainCombiner combiner" are used for equal() but not hashCode()? 2. Is it expected that two AccessControlContext objects considered equal via method equals() should return same results for AccessControlContext.checkPermission()? In addition, current JCK tests (both Java 7 & 8) validate AccessControlContext.hashCode() by calculating only field "ProtectionDomain[] context". Does it make sense to challenge JCK if I would like add more fields for hashCode calculation? Your insight is appreciated. Thanks, Frank
