Hi Jason
The change looks quite straightforward, but have you checked if our codes
actually comply with RFC 5280 especially for those areas where RFC 5280 is
different from RFC 3280? http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5280#page-5 lists the
differences. For example, there is an item:
* Section 4.2.1.5 recommends marking the policy mappings extension
as critical. RFC 3280 required that the policy mappings
extension be marked as non-critical.
In PolicyMappingsExtension.java, the 2 constructors that generate a
PolicyMappingsExtension object both set critical to false. Is this something we
should reconsider?
Thanks
Max
On Sep 19, 2014, at 9:27, Jason Uh <[email protected]> wrote:
> Please review this changeset, which updates references to RFC 3280 to RFC
> 5280. RFC 5280 has obsoleted 3280.
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~juh/8037550/webrev.03/
>
> Thanks,
> Jason
