One more round of updates. Only the test code and the test inputs have changed. Test input is now Base64 format, with comment headers that display the OCSP response pretty-print (or an asn1parse of the BasicOCSPResponse for malformed response test cases).

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jnimeh/reviews/8074064/webrev.03/index.html

Thanks, Vinnie for the feedback and suggestions!
--Jamil

On 03/03/2015 04:10 PM, Jamil Nimeh wrote:
Okay, I've got an updated webrev for this issue:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jnimeh/reviews/8074064/webrev.02/index.html

Thanks,
--Jamil

On 03/03/2015 02:18 PM, Jamil Nimeh wrote:
Hello all, I've come across a couple edge cases that this fix doesn't cover properly. I'll put out another webrev in a bit that should tighten up the singleResponse parsing, particularly with the optional fields. It will also include a couple other negative test input samples.

Thanks,
--Jamil

On 03/02/2015 04:05 PM, Jamil Nimeh wrote:
Hello all, this review fixes an issue in OCSPResponse where it does not parse singleExtensions in the SingleResponse structure. I also fixed two minor deviations from the OCSP.RevocationStatus interface when getRevocationTime and getRevocationReason are called on good responses.

Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8074064
Review: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jnimeh/reviews/8074064/webrev.01/index.html

Thank you,
--Jamil



Reply via email to