Hi Valerie,

Thanks for comments! I have fixed all of them.

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rhalade/8048601/webrev.01/

- Rajan

On 8/20/15 4:19 PM, Valerie Peng wrote:
Rajan,

Here are some comments for the other half of the webrev:
TestCipherTextLength.java
1) line 82 and 85, why TEXT_LEN is needed? I don't find any usage of it inside runAll(..) method?
removed.
2) the names here are a bit too similar, e.g. PBEWrapper, PBECipherWrapper, AESPBEWrapper. The individual subclasses aren't that big, why not make them inner static classes of the parent class? No need to repeat the Wrapper and PBE in the subclass names. To match your other wrapper class DESCipherWrapper, perhaps you can rename the PBE counterpart to something like:

PBECipherWrapper (parent) with subclasses (defined statically inside PBECipherWrapper) named PBKDF2, AES, and Legacy (these are PKCS#5 v1.5 defined algorithms).
fixed, thanks!

PBKDF2Wrapper.java
1) typo on line 43 and 52 - should be T_R_ANSFORMATION
fixed
2) Instead of "PKDF2_DEFAULT_KEY_LEN" (typo? I think u meant PBKDF2), it should really be CIPHER_KEY_SIZE since the purpose here is to generate keys for the Cipher object.
renamed the variable.
3) the key that you generated on line 57 can be viewed as an intermediate key. You could have moved the processing in initCipher(...) method into the constructor and store the resulting cipher key into 'key'. For example:
    SecretKey derivedKey = keyFactory.generateSecret(pbeKeySpec);
    key = new SecretKeySpec(derivedKey.getEncoded(), KEY_ALGORITHM);
key is generated in consturctor.

Thanks,
Valerie

On 8/19/2015 3:38 PM, Valerie Peng wrote:
Rajan,

TestCipher.java
1) this class is used as the base for many algorithm, modes, and paddings. But then it hardcodes some values or parameter types which may not work against some algorithms, e.g. IvParameterSpec with 8-byte value, padding length being 8 bytes. PAD_LEN=8 vs PAD_BYTES=16, is this difference intentional? Seems to me that this TestCipher class only works against Ciphers w/ 8-byte blocks and uses iv. I think it's clearer to have a constant named BLKSIZE instead of just 8.
Yes. I have changed iv to be final variable now initialized in constructor.
2) Also, u don't need to repeatedly generate random bytes for input data, IV, etc. The input data can be generated once outside of loop. As for the parameters, either u can just let the cipher object generates it or grab the IV values from whatever data that u have already, e.g. certain part of the input data.
fixed, no need for random anymore.
2) input length is always 800. Would be nice to have a comment stating the requirement, e.g. multiple of blocks in order to work against ciphers w/ NoPadding 3) line 54, Would be nice to clarify that the range of tested key size is from MINIMUM_KEY_SIZE to what returned by Cipher.getMaxAllowedKeyLength(ALGORITHM) with the increment of KEYCUTTER.
added comments.
4) line 66, keyStrength is better phrased as variousKeySize in my opinion.
renamed to variousKeySize.
5) MINIMUM_KEY_SIZE and KEYCUTTER should be algorithm specific. It'd be clearer to explicitly list out the algorithms which works against the the hardcoded values for the sake of maintenance.
added comments.
6) It looks to me that String[] modes and String[] paddings could be moved to runAll(). This seems more consistent with the signature of runTest() where mode and padding are again specified here.
I left it as is and changed runTest to private method. Either is ok with me.

Thanks,
Rajan

Will send u comments regarding the TestLength ones in a separate email.
Thanks,
Valerie

On 7/14/2015 1:27 PM, Rajan Halade wrote:
May I request you to review new tests added to check Cipher operations with different algorithms and modes.

Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rhalade/8048601/webrev.00/
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8048601

Thanks,
Rajan

Reply via email to