> On Jan 4, 2016, at 4:19 PM, Xuelei Fan <[email protected]> wrote: > > An interesting bug. Looks fine to me.
Yes, I could have closed it as "Not Reproducible" and wait for another 4 years to fix it. --Max > > Xuelei > > On 1/1/2016 1:26 AM, Wang Weijun wrote: >> Hi >> >> Please review the fix of https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8146377. >> Some years have more days than 365 and the test fails. The fix is simply >> >> diff --git a/test/sun/security/tools/jarsigner/concise_jarsigner.sh >> b/test/sun/security/tools/jarsigner/concise_jarsigner.sh >> --- a/test/sun/security/tools/jarsigner/concise_jarsigner.sh >> +++ b/test/sun/security/tools/jarsigner/concise_jarsigner.sh >> @@ -69,8 +69,8 @@ >> # First part: output format >> # ========================================================== >> >> -$KT -genkeypair -alias a1 -dname CN=a1 -validity 365 >> -$KT -genkeypair -alias a2 -dname CN=a2 -validity 365 >> +$KT -genkeypair -alias a1 -dname CN=a1 -validity 366 >> +$KT -genkeypair -alias a2 -dname CN=a2 -validity 366 >> >> # a.jar includes 8 unsigned, 2 signed by a1 and a2, 2 signed by a3 >> $JAR cvf a.jar A1.class A2.class >> >> Thanks >> Max >> >
