A new webrev at
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8130302/webrev.01/
The options for keytool have
-provider <name> [-providerArg <arg>] add a provider by name
-providerclass <class> [-providerArg <arg>] add a provider by classname
(omit some words because line is too long)
for jarsigner
[-provider <name> add a security provider by a provider name
[-providerArg <arg>]] ... configure argument for -provider
[-providerClass <class> add a security provider by a fully-qualified
classname
[-providerArg <arg>]] ... configure argument for -providerClass
In the test AltProvider.java, I compiled 2 classes (DummyProvider and
module-info) for a new module and they manually create the modulepath
directory. Is there a more formal way to do that?
Thanks
Max
> On Feb 18, 2016, at 10:55 PM, Mandy Chung <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>> On Feb 18, 2016, at 1:52 AM, Alan Bateman <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 18/02/2016 09:08, Weijun Wang wrote:
>>> OK, but with -providerClass I'd like to support a class name even if it is
>>> already defined in a module as a service and has its own name. This makes
>>> sure old commands still work.
>> I think it should work fine but I assume we would want to discourage this.
>> That is, these security providers are service provider and there should be
>> no need for anyone to know the name of the implementation class.
>>
>
> Exactly.
>
> Note that the current ProviderConfig implementation doesn’t support
> security.provider.N=<classname> if this is loaded from the another named
> module. It should throw IAE.
>
> Mandy
