> On Mar 21, 2016, at 1:23 PM, Wang Weijun <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>> On Mar 21, 2016, at 1:15 PM, Wang Weijun <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> if (ins.getCapability() != NONE) {
>
> Ah, should be
>
> if (ins.getCapability() != NONE && ins.getCapability() != PR_ONLY) {
Oh, back to
if (ins.getCapability() != NONE) {
because I just removed PR_ONLY in the webrev.
I was thinking about an existing provider, that claims it supports PR but only
implements the old abstract methods, thus no reseed. Thinking again, since it
also has not added the constructor with params, it will not be chosen by
getInstance(alg,params) and also does not support getParameters(). Therefore it
has nothing to do with the Capability class.
--Max
>
> --Max
>
