Hi Mandy,

Hopefully the third time will be the charm for this changeset after your correction to the commented-out test:

    http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~darcy/8151763.2

I aligned the bug number in column 64 unless the test name took more characters. (This isn't as evident in the webrev since the tab expansion is different than in a text editor.)

Thanks,

-Joe

On 3/29/2016 12:31 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
On Mar 29, 2016, at 12:15 PM, joe darcy <joe.da...@oracle.com> wrote:

Hi Mandy,

On 3/28/2016 8:48 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
On Mar 28, 2016, at 5:03 PM, Joseph D. Darcy <joe.da...@oracle.com> wrote:

Hello,

New iteration of the webrev updated after the Jigsaw integration and 
incorporating the earlier feedback.

    http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~darcy/8151763.1

# tools/jimage/JImageTest.java                                    
linux-i586,windows-i586

Is this test accidentally removed?  Other than this, looks okay.
The "#" lines are comments so I was removing a commented out line. (I assumed, 
but did not verify, the line for this test was a leftover artifact of the recent Jigsaw 
merge.)
I missed “#” since this test should be excluded (some error might have been 
creeped in before the integration)

This test needs to be added back in the problem list.  I’ll create a changeset.

Nit: it’d be good to have most of bug ids aligned in the same column start.
Here are a few ones:

  210 sun/security/krb5/auto/Unreachable.java     7164518 macosx-all no 
PortUnreachableException on Mac
  212 java/security/KeyPairGenerator/SolarisShortDSA.java 7041639 solaris-all 
Solaris DSA keypair generation bug
  213 sun/security/tools/keytool/standard.sh              7041639 solaris-all 
Solaris DSA keypair generation bug
  346 java/util/Arrays/ParallelPrefix.java 8080165,8085982 generic-all
  348 java/util/BitSet/BitSetStreamTest.java 8079538 generic-all
  360 sun/tools/jmap/heapconfig/JMapHeapConfigTest.java 8072131,8132452 
generic-all
  370 sun/tools/jinfo/JInfoSanityTest.java                           8059035 
generic-all


I was trying to avoid introducing lots of spacing changes in an attempt to make 
the patch easier to review, but I can look over these cases again.
That’d be good.  Thanks
Mandy

Reply via email to