Looks fine to me. Thanks, Xuelei
On 4/11/2016 11:59 PM, Anthony Scarpino wrote: > Ok.. I changed it to: > {@code jdk.security.provider.preferred} {@link > Security#getProperty(String) Security} > > I updated it at the same link if someone wants to double check my work > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ascarpino/8152205/webrev/ > > Tony > > On 04/07/2016 11:42 AM, Bradford Wetmore wrote: >> On 4/6/2016 6:40 PM, Wang Weijun wrote: >>> In my DRBG changeset, I use this style: >>> >>> {@code jdk.security.provider.preferred} {@linkplain >>> Security#getProperty(String) security property} >> >> I like this or >> >> {@code jdk.security.provider.preferred} {@link >> Security#getProperty(String) Security) >> >> Brad >> >> >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Apr 7, 2016, at 8:23 AM, Bradford Wetmore >>>> <bradford.wetm...@oracle.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> If I was doing this from scratch, I would probably capitalize it to >>>> indicate it's a java.security.Security property and add inside the >>>> @code. >>>> >>>> {@code jdk.security.provider.preferred} security >>>> -> >>>> {@code jdk.security.provider.preferred Security} >>>> >>>> But I see it done that way in other places, so this is fine. >>>> >>>> Brad >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 4/6/2016 3:47 PM, Xuelei Fan wrote: >>>>> Looks fine to me. >>>>> >>>>> Xuelei >>>>> >>>>> On 4/7/2016 5:23 AM, Anthony Scarpino wrote: >>>>>> I need a review of this very simple doc clarification. Calling out >>>>>> jdk.security.provider.preferred as a "security property" instead of >>>>>> just >>>>>> a "property". >>>>>> >>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ascarpino/8152205/webrev/ >>>>>> >>>>>> thanks. >>>>>> >>>>>> Tony >>>>> >>> >