OK.
On 8/24/2016 10:00 AM, Weijun Wang wrote:
I've updated the test at
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8164656/webrev.01/
No more ratio things.
When the ratio was invented for BadKdc, it was because it uses real KDCs
and we have to find a balance between unexpected timeout and test speed.
Changing a single ratio is much easier to modify hundreds of timeout and
pattern across 6 test files.
In KdcPolicy.java, most requests go to fake KDCs and the timeout is
already super short. For the few cases where a real KDC is needed, even
if we need to tweak the timeout later (if intermittent failures still
happen), it will be much easier to just tweak on the actual timeout
value directly.
Thanks
Max
On 8/24/2016 8:06, Xuelei Fan wrote:
Looks fine to me.
Xuelei
On 8/24/2016 12:14 AM, Weijun Wang wrote:
Please review the change at
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8164656/webrev.00/
The old try-catch is only on send/receive, but NetClient.getInstance()
could also timeout for TCP when it calls Socket::connect(dest,timeout).
Therefore move the catch to a higher level.
The test is brand new and it's meant to replace existing BadKdc?.java,
TcpTimeout.java and MaxRetries.java. In fact, I discover this bug when I
am writing it. The new test is much faster because in most cases there
is no real KDC and timeout can be very short. It contains 2 @run and
each spends a little more than half a minute to run on my laptop.
Thanks
Max
