I am OK with your fix, but I found "(latch + 1) % Integer.MAX_VALUE" a little 
difficult to understand. Does rndTab[latch & 0xff] also work?


> On Sep 21, 2016, at 11:57 PM, Jamil Nimeh <jamil.j.ni...@oracle.com> wrote:
> Hi Max and Xuelei,
> Yesterday I also reached out to the SQE engineer who submitted the bug, 
> asking if this is an issue he's seen going forward from the original instance 
> in 8u20.  He said that he hasn't seen this issue come up since the original 
> bug submission.  Since the simple overflow condition is easily solved with my 
> fix, and the code has been otherwise stable I'd like to suggest that we keep 
> the fix as-is.  The loop timing as it stands now is not the source of the 
> bug, other than that latch can overflow and that is solved in one line.  If 
> we want to revisit this and improve the overall performance (though I haven't 
> seen evidence that there is a perf issue with this at all) then maybe an RFE 
> is in order.  What do you think?
> --Jamil

Reply via email to