Hi,
I need a review for this P2 TCK-RED-9 bug.
The original request (JDK-8166350) was for documenting null algorithm
names in the 3 new DRBG getInstances() in SecureRandom, but there is a
12 year old bug for the same thing throughout the
JCA/JCE/JSSE/JGSS/JAAS. I've gone ahead and fixed.
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-4985694
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~wetmore/4985694/webrev.00/
Other comments:
. Instead of waiting for a NP to be generated by the code, added a
hardcoded NPE parameter sanity check:
Objects.requireNonNull(algorithm, "null algorithm name");
. verified APIs to ensure proper exceptions are thrown for null/empty
algorithm/provider Strings and null Providers.
. Added a full test suite for all getInstances to check for above,
including a reflection check for future getInstances.
. Some minor javadoc cleanup/reorgs, mainly to the
@returns/@throws/@exceptions tags (e.g. {@code ...}/alphabetizing/ending
"." on phrases} for consistency and to conform to current javadoc
standards. I've tried to be consistent throughout (@code's around class
names}, but I know I have missed a couple things here/there (no @code's
around parameter names). I do need to move onto other things.
Thanks,
Brad
