It's up to you. You can change it now if you have time, or we can do it
once we need to update jarsigner tests.
Artem
On 01/20/2017 12:23 PM, Weijun Wang wrote:
Also, I am feeling that the jarsigner-related calls are quite
complicated. I suggest we use the same method for signing and
verifying and ask the user to provide all arguments in their order. So
instead of calling
SecurityTools.jarsigner("x.jar", "alias", "...");
we just call
SecurityTools.jarsigner("... x.jar alias");
This looks better to me as well.
I am fine with current webrevs.
A little confused. Do you think the current webrev is fine or is it
better to rewrite jarsigner()?
