Looks good. --Sean
On 2/14/17 5:55 AM, Wang Weijun wrote:
Please review this doc bug diff --git a/src/java.base/share/classes/java/security/DrbgParameters.java b/src/java.base/share/classes/java/security/DrbgParameters.java --- a/src/java.base/share/classes/java/security/DrbgParameters.java +++ b/src/java.base/share/classes/java/security/DrbgParameters.java @@ -53,8 +53,8 @@ * for CTR_DRBG. Please note that it is not the algorithm used in * {@link SecureRandom#getInstance}, which we will call a * <em>SecureRandom algorithm</em> below), - * <li> optionally features, including prediction resistance - * and reseeding supports. + * <li> optional features, including prediction resistance + * and reseeding supports, * <li> highest security strength. * </ul> * <p> diff --git a/src/java.base/share/classes/java/security/SecureRandom.java b/src/java.base/share/classes/java/security/SecureRandom.java --- a/src/java.base/share/classes/java/security/SecureRandom.java +++ b/src/java.base/share/classes/java/security/SecureRandom.java @@ -64,8 +64,8 @@ * <blockquote><pre> * SecureRandom r1 = new SecureRandom(); * SecureRandom r2 = SecureRandom.getInstance("NativePRNG"); - * SecureRandom r3 = SecureRandom("DRBG", - * DrbgParameters.Instantiation(128, RESEED_ONLY, null));</pre> + * SecureRandom r3 = SecureRandom.getInstance("DRBG", + * DrbgParameters.instantiation(128, RESEED_ONLY, null));</pre> * </blockquote> * * <p> The third statement above returns a {@code SecureRandom} object of the Thanks Max