On 3/27/17 10:56 AM, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
Hi Sean,
thank you!
Is it planned to fix 8054380? I see it is still open, but the assignee
(Jason Uh) is marked as inactive and the issue is dormant since creation.
Not for JDK 9 since it is not critical. Note that this is only an issue
when creating certificates with keytool and not when validating
certificates. You could try using another tool to create certificates.
--Sean
..Thomas
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 4:42 PM, Sean Mullan <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Good catch, I actually closed it as a duplicate but marked it as a
duplicate of the wrong bug, it should have been
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8054380
<https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8054380>
I fixed it so 8054380 is now the duplicate.
--Sean
On 3/27/17 9:26 AM, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
Hi all,
just a question, I hope this is the correct mailing list.
There is https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8016345
<https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8016345>, which is
about DNSName not accepting host names with leading numbers,
which is
valid according to https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1123
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tools.ietf.org_html_rfc1123&d=DwMFaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PQcxBKCX5YTpkKY057SbK10&r=wLZjDoZBdVMUe0-SnmtSgQUVl_gHmb_3aP58rurBKYA&m=DIIlALFx4DAHzx8FoLMhTQreVvtYOfMOHKfC_BltFn0&s=P6InJ7Ev_MpscdwaQI48sF2uMdTwbt124szmBQY03zE&e=>
(Section 2.1).
This bug was marked as a duplicate
of https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8007706
<https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8007706>, which I do not
understand - what do these errors have in common?
I try to understand why JDK-8016345 was marked as will-not-fix. Are
there any reasons to not fix the parser in DNSName.java (because
the fix
itself looks trivial)?
Thank you, and Kind Regards, Thomas
