Thanks, webrev updated again at:

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~valeriep/8180635/webrev.02/

Valerie
On 5/30/2017 10:50 AM, Sean Mullan wrote:
Just a couple more comments, in this text in each class:

* <b>Java&trade;
* Cryptography Architecture JDK Providers Documentation</b></a>
* document for information on the AlgorithmParameterGenerator defaults
* used by JDK providers.

Don't use bold (<b>) on the document name.

The words "Documentation" and "document" are redundant.

Drop the JCA part. The new guide in JDK 9 will not include that in the title. So, I suggest changing it to simply "JDK Providers", ex:

* <b>JDK Providers</b></a>
* document for information on the AlgorithmParameterGenerator defaults
* used by JDK providers.

--Sean

On 5/26/17 6:54 PM, Valerie Peng wrote:
Sean,

Thanks for the wording suggestions.
Webrev updated at: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~valeriep/8180635/webrev.01/

Have a wonderful long weekend,
Valerie

On 5/26/2017 5:48 AM, Sean Mullan wrote:
Just a couple of comments:

- the same text is in KeyPairGeneratorSpi and AlgorithmParameterGeneratorSpi so we should add the warning in those classes too

- we should add the same warning to javax.crypto.KeyGenerator and KeyGeneratorSpi

- Please change "Oracle Providers" to "JDK Providers", since all of these providers are included in the JDK implementation, and we don't want to include "Oracle" in the javadocs. (Plus the name of this guide will be changed to "JDK Providers" at some point in the near future).

- Suggest changing the sentence "Even ..." to "Additionally, the default value for a provider may change in a future version."

- s/Thus/Therefore/

--Sean

On 5/23/17 10:13 PM, Valerie Peng wrote:
Sean,

Can you please review this javadoc-only changes for JDK 9?

Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8180635
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~valeriep/8180635/webrev.00/

Thanks,
Valerie




Reply via email to