Thanks for the feedback. I suppose we can ignore values which obviously don't make sense such as 0 or max being less than min key size. However, if the underlying PKCS11 library vendors forgot to update the max value as in your comment#2, supposedly they should fix it. I am not too keen to add an env var/system property to accommodate this kind of PKCS11 library bugs since this should be rare I hope.
Valerie

On 1/30/2018 12:22 AM, Tomas Gustavsson wrote:
Hi,

At some revision in the PKCS#11 provider there was introduced checking
of C_GetMechanismInfo min and max sizes.

This has turned out to be a bit fragile. Let me give two real world
examples:

1. Amazon Cloud HSM report minSize and maxSize for EC keys to 0. The
Java PKCS#11 provider will happily take 0 as maxSize and refuse to
generate any EC keys at all. Needless to say, without the Java check it
would be no problem.

131: C_GetMechanismInfo
2018-01-30 07:52:20.740
[in] slotID = 0x1
  CKM_EC_KEY_PAIR_GEN
[out] pInfo:
CKM_EC_KEY_PAIR_GEN           : min:0 max:0 flags:0x10001 ( Hardware
KeyPair )
Returned:  0 CKR_OK

(we are reporting this to Amazon as well)

2. Thales HSMs (some?) report maxSize for RSA_PKCS key generation as
4096, but will happily generate 8192 bit keys. I.e. the reported maxSize
is not true.
We have customers who used to generate 8192 bit RSA keys, but after a
Java update can not do so anymore, because Java compares against this value.


* Suggestions:

1. In the constructor of P11KeyPairGenerator where minKeyLen and
maxKeyLen are calculated, never allow maxKeyLen to be less than minKeyLen.

I.e. change the part:
         // auto-adjust default keysize in case it's out-of-range
         if ((minKeyLen != -1) && (keySize < minKeyLen)) {
             keySize = minKeyLen;
         }
         if ((maxKeyLen != -1) && (keySize > maxKeyLen)) {
             keySize = maxKeyLen;
         }

To include something like:
         // auto-adjust default keysize in case it's out-of-range
         if ((minKeyLen != -1) && (keySize < minKeyLen)) {
             keySize = minKeyLen;
         }
         if ((maxKeyLen != -1) && (maxKeyLen < minKeyLen)) {
             maxKeyLen = minKeyLen;
         }
         if ((maxKeyLen != -1) && (keySize > maxKeyLen)) {
             keySize = maxKeyLen;
         }

2. Allow to ignore checking of maxKeyLen by some means, i.e. allow to
ignore checking against C_GetMechanismInfo if you know that the HSM does
not provide sane values. I.e. an environment variable for example
reverting back to the old behavior when these were ignored.

Regards,
Tomas Gustavsson


Reply via email to