> On Mar 13, 2018, at 11:54 PM, Xuelei Fan <xuelei....@oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> On 3/13/2018 1:06 AM, Weijun Wang wrote:
>>> On Mar 12, 2018, at 10:41 PM, Sean Mullan <sean.mul...@oracle.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I would tend to think that we should only specify (or guarantee) that 
>>> standard names are checked and used in the disabled algorithm properties.
>> But this means first we must only set standard names in the properties. What 
>> if someone sets a non-standard one? Do we just accept it as a raw string and 
>> only reject an algorithm if it is also using the non-standard name?
> Where does the non-standard name come from?  

The setting inside java.security. I know we use standard names now, but 
customer can change it.

> Maybe, before calling into the crypto constraints methods, the name can be 
> standardized.

We will need a table, not based on aliases in any provider.

--Max

> 
> Xuelei

Reply via email to