Sure, should be fine...
Valerie
On 4/25/2018 9:48 PM, Weijun Wang wrote:
I filed https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8202300 but might not have
time to make it into JDK 11.
--Max
On Apr 26, 2018, at 12:06 AM, Weijun Wang <weijun.w...@oracle.com> wrote:
I'll keep using int32 (at least in this fix), both Java and MIT krb5 contain
these words
* Workaround implementation incompatibilities by not generating
* initial sequence numbers greater than 2^30
So bad thing could only happen after 2^30 messages.
--Max
On Apr 25, 2018, at 10:38 PM, Weijun Wang <weijun.w...@oracle.com> wrote:
It's complicated. Looks like MIT krb5 uses a uint32 for old etypes (DES, 3DES,
RC4) and a uint64 for new ones (AES) [1][2].
I'll do more experiments.
Thanks
Max
[1]
https://github.com/krb5/krb5/blob/master/src/lib/gssapi/generic/util_seqstate.c#L76
[2]
https://github.com/krb5/krb5/blob/master/src/lib/gssapi/krb5/init_sec_context.c#L825
On Apr 24, 2018, at 8:55 PM, Wang Weijun <weijun.w...@oracle.com> wrote:
RFC 4120 5.5.1 has
seq-number
This optional field includes the initial sequence number to be used by the
KRB_PRIV or KRB_SAFE messages when sequence numbers are used to detect replays.
(It may also be used by application specific messages.) When included in the
authenticator, this field specifies the initial sequence number for messages
from the client to the server. When included in the AP-REP message, the initial
sequence number is that for messages from the server to the client. When used
in KRB_PRIV or KRB_SAFE messages, it is incremented by one after each message
is sent. Sequence numbers fall in the range 0 through 2^32 - 1 and wrap to zero
following the value 2^32 - 1.
If it wraps, then it’s 4 bytes.
I will read more on it.
Thanks
Max
在 2018年4月24日，18:08，Valerie Peng <valerie.p...@oracle.com> 写道：
Hi Max,
Most changes look good. I have only some comments and questions (see below):
- InitSecContextToken.java, line 62: bad -> unrecognized?
- According to the class javadoc of various Token classes and Kerberos spec,
the sequence number is 8-byte integer from header byte 8-15, but java int have
only 4 bytes. The current code seems to assume the first 4 bytes of the
sequence number are always 0. For the sake of compliance and max
inter-operability, maybe we should use long to store the sequence number?
CSR looks good to me.
Thanks,
Valerie
On 4/18/2018 10:40 AM, Weijun Wang wrote:
Please take a review of this fix:
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8201627/webrev.00/
CSR: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8201814
Basically we fix some bugs and introduce a system property so we can interop
with everyone.
Thanks
Max
