Ok, I will try add it back.
Thanks,
Valerie
On 7/17/2018 1:14 PM, Sean Mullan wrote:
On 7/16/18 9:46 PM, Valerie Peng wrote:
As for the part about "randomly generated", I am leaning toward not
having it as I don't see a value of specifying this.
Hmm, I think it is important to continue to document the case where an
implementation may return default/generated parameters even if it was
not explicitly initialized with any. Maybe we don't need the "randomly
generated" wording, but since that wording has been there for many
releases, I would be hesitant to remove it.
--Sean
