Hi, Max,

In  my first prototype, I got rid of the Entries classes (for both SUN and SunRsaSign provider) and adds the Services inside the Provider. Later, when I saw VerificationProvider class and its dependency on the Entries class, I have to revert back to the original approach of having the Entries classes. I thought about putting the Entries classes into their provider classes, however, I am not sure if any of our licensee may remove SUN, SunRsaSign provider class which is why we have VerificationProvider. So, I think having separate Entries classes are probably the safest choice. As for creating a HashSet to store the services and then putting them into provider object in individual provider class is to work with the current API of Provider.putService()...

If you have better suggestion, I am all ears...

Thanks!
Valerie


On 12/3/2018 7:57 PM, Weijun Wang wrote:
In fact, if the only reason why those Entries classes exist is because of 
VerificationProvider, can we move the content back into their Provider class as 
a public static method which is still callable by VerificationProvider?

—Max

在 2018年12月4日,11:43,Weijun Wang <weijun.w...@oracle.com> 写道:

Hi Valerie

I'm looking at the put->putService changes. Before this, a single put() in 
SunRsaSignEntries call adds a service but now you need to add() into a 
LinkedHashSet first in SunRsaSignEntries and then putService() each back in 
SunRsaSign.

I don't have a simple way to do this since Provider::putService is protected 
and SunRsaSignEntries is also used in VerificationProvider, just wonder if you 
have thought about this.

Thanks
Max

On Nov 22, 2018, at 2:05 AM, Valerie Peng <valerie.p...@oracle.com> wrote:

Hi,

Can someone help reviewing this fix?

Besides changing the Provider class to use ConcurrentHashMap in order to reduce 
the lock contention on Provider.getService() calls, I also changed the security 
providers in java.base module to register through putService(...) calls. 
Performance is manually verified and mach5 run is clean.

Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-7092821
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~valeriep/7092821/webrev.00/

Thanks,
Valerie

Reply via email to