Martin,
Newer JDK families should be using the PKCS12 keystore format. For that
reason, I kept it 8u only. It was a solution to address a particular use
case reported by an Oracle JDK user.
regards,
Sean.
On 30/10/2019 18:21, Martin Balao wrote:
Hi,
I've noticed that 8223269 [1] (not public) has been included in Oracle's
8u231 JDK [2].
Is there a reason not to have this in JDK baseline? (and, thus, create a
backport for the open JDKs)
In case there is not, I'll proceed with a new ticket (unless you want to
make [1] public), a CSR and a patch.
Thanks,
Martin.-
--
[1] - https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8223269
[2] -
https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/8u231-relnotes-5592812.html#JDK-8223269
