Hi Matthias, the entry in ProblemList.txt can't refer to 8237869, which is the bug that you're using to submit the exclusion. It must refer to the item that shall resolve the underlying issue which probably is Oracle's private bug that Sean referred to.
@Sean: In the interest of backportability, I'd ask you to either open up the internal bug and supply its id. If that isn't possible, could you please create a new public item and have your internal bug refer to it? Thanks Christoph > -----Original Message----- > From: security-dev <security-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net> On Behalf Of > Baesken, Matthias > Sent: Montag, 27. Januar 2020 10:25 > To: Sean Mullan <sean.mul...@oracle.com>; security- > d...@openjdk.java.net > Subject: [CAUTION] RFR [XS]: 8237869: exclude jtreg test > security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/LuxTrustCA. > java because of instabilities - was : RE: jtreg test > security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/LuxTrust... > > Hello, please review the exclusion of jtreg test > security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/LuxTrustCA. > java . > > Bug/webrev : > > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8237869 > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbaesken/webrevs/8237869.0/ > > Thanks, Matthias > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Sean Mullan <sean.mul...@oracle.com> > > Sent: Freitag, 24. Januar 2020 21:11 > > To: Baesken, Matthias <matthias.baes...@sap.com>; security- > > d...@openjdk.java.net > > Subject: Re: jtreg test > > > security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/LuxTrustCA. > > java instabilities > > > > On 1/24/20 3:40 AM, Baesken, Matthias wrote: > > > Hi Sean, thanks for looking into it . > > > > > >>However, there is no nextUpdate field set, which means there should > be > > always newer information available. So while the 5 minute delay may not > be > > a huge issue, the fact that they are returning cached responses, > > > > > >>looks like a problem to me.This could be the underlying problem, in that > > they are not generating fresh OCSPResponses. I will contact LuxTrust and > see > > if we can get some information from them. > > > > > > Can we exclude the test until the issue is resolved ? > > > > Ok, that is fine with me. > >
