Good to have a CSR. Please review:
CSR: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8240974
Thanks,
Xuelei
On 3/12/2020 2:29 PM, Sean Mullan wrote:
The fix looks good, although I think you should also file a CSR since
this provider name was at one time documented and supported and you
mentioned that it was still supported in the previous CSR when the
com.sun.net.ssl package was removed [1].
Thanks,
Sean
[1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8218932
On 3/12/20 1:39 PM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
Hi,
Could I get the following update reviewed?
Bug#: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8219989
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~xuelei/8219989/webrev.00/
Release note task: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8240967
This is a request to remove the legacy SunJSSE provider name,
"com.sun.net.ssl.internal.ssl.Provider". The "SunJSSE" should be used
instead (for example, "SSLContext.getInstance("TLS", "SunJSSE")").
The use of the legacy provider name should be rare now. But please
let me know if you have concerns before March 19, 2019.
Thanks,
Xuelei
