On 6/3/2020 8:15 AM, Weijun Wang wrote:
On Jun 3, 2020, at 10:10 PM, Xuelei Fan <xuelei....@oracle.com> wrote:
It looks good to me.
Thanks.
BTW, I may declare KnownOIDs.oid as final and use it directly, rather than use
the value() method.
I'll keep it flexible at the moment. I dreamed of a day where an OID is only
its DER sequence and seldom needs to be converted to its name or numerical
format.
Okay. I may keep the KnownOIDs.oid and add a KnownOIDs.encodedOid if
needed.
Xuelei
--Max
Xuelei
On 6/2/2020 11:27 PM, Weijun Wang wrote:
Please review the code change at
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8246397/webrev.00/
The following KnownOIDs lines are related, in case you want to compare the
values.
59: SubjectKeyID("2.5.29.14"),
60: KeyUsage("2.5.29.15"),
61: PrivateKeyUsage("2.5.29.16"),
62: SubjectAlternativeName("2.5.29.17"),
65: CRLNumber("2.5.29.20"),
68: InvalidityDate("2.5.29.24"),
72: NameConstraints("2.5.29.30"),
74: CertificatePolicies("2.5.29.32"),
75: CE_CERT_POLICIES_ANY("2.5.29.32.0"),
77: AuthorityKeyID("2.5.29.35"),
79: extendedKeyUsage("2.5.29.37"),
372: X25519("1.3.101.110"),
373: X448("1.3.101.111"),
Noreg-cleanup.
Thanks,
Max
