From just a quick skimming across a few FIPS specs, it looks like DSA with SHA-3 seems worth including.  FIPS 202 is designed to supplement the hash algs in 180-4, and Section 2.3 of 186-4 indicates that SHAx(M) is intended for those algs specified in 180 (and I assume by extension 202).  Since there are OIDs in the NIST arc for dsa-with-sha3-nnn it seems like all the pieces have specification support.  Seems like a good thing to do.

--Jamil

On 8/18/2020 1:11 PM, Valerie Peng wrote:

Can someone help review this SHA-3 based signature support? Note that changes to SunPKCS11 provider will be covered by a separate RFE (JDK-8244154). Current webrev adds SHA-3 digest support to DSA, RSA, ECDSA signature algorithms. I am a bit on the fence for the DSA signature and am including it here mostly for completeness sake. Can remove it if that's preferred. Comments?

Will file a CSR for this once we reached consensus on whether to add SHA-3 support to DSA signature.

RFE: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8172366

Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~valeriep/8172366/webrev.00/

Thanks,
Valerie

Reply via email to