On Mon, 4 Jan 2021 15:11:27 GMT, Roger Riggs <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Peter Levart has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> revert the unrelated change
>
> The bug title and the PR title need to be the same.
> Editing either one is fine.
But wouldn't it be legal for a compiler (java to bytecode or bytecode to
machinecode) to replace references of my_local_copy with references to
static_field?
Foo my_local_copy = static_field;
if (my_copy == null) {
initialize();
my_local_copy = static_field;
}
return my_local_copy;
Only if static_field was volatile this would be illegal, wouldn't it?
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/1914
