On Fri, 2 Apr 2021 11:52:16 GMT, Weijun Wang <wei...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>>> Maybe we don't need to resolve it in this code change. If we look carefully >>> at RFC 8410 Sections 10.1 and 10.2, it shows the X25519 certificate in 10.2 >>> is using the signer's SKID in 10.1 as its own SKID and it has no AKID. >>> Currently, keytool will generate a new SKID and use signer's SKID as AKID. >>> If we really want to generate a certificate that's identical to the one in >>> the RFC, we'll need a way to tell keytool to omit the AKID (something like >>> "-ext akid=none"). >> >> Better to use AKID for certification path building. > > I don't mean we will remove it by default. Just think there needs a way to > remove either AKID or SKID, because we always generate them automatically. The support for omitting AKID will be tracked by different PR if needed. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3281