On Fri, 2 Apr 2021 11:52:16 GMT, Weijun Wang <wei...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>>> Maybe we don't need to resolve it in this code change. If we look carefully 
>>> at RFC 8410 Sections 10.1 and 10.2, it shows the X25519 certificate in 10.2 
>>> is using the signer's SKID in 10.1 as its own SKID and it has no AKID. 
>>> Currently, keytool will generate a new SKID and use signer's SKID as AKID. 
>>> If we really want to generate a certificate that's identical to the one in 
>>> the RFC, we'll need a way to tell keytool to omit the AKID (something like 
>>> "-ext akid=none").
>> 
>> Better to use AKID for certification path building.
>
> I don't mean we will remove it by default. Just think there needs a way to 
> remove either AKID or SKID, because we always generate them automatically.

The support for omitting AKID will be tracked by different PR if needed.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3281

Reply via email to