2021/8/3 9:40:58 -0700, sean.mul...@oracle.com: > On 8/2/21 8:28 PM, Peter Firmstone wrote: >> ... >> >> Having established that OpenJDK is not yet willing to compromise, I have >> been attempting to create an authorization layer using Agents, so that I >> can restore perimeter security following the removal of SM and support >> future versions of Java. It is my hope that either I will be >> successful in recreating an authorization layer, or that enough people >> come forward and OpenJDK decides there are enough affected developers to >> find a compromise that either makes migration practical, or less expensive. > > You may have some interesting ideas, but in my opinion you have not > presented them in a clear and easily digestible manner, and your long > emails are time consuming to read, repetitive and often diverge into > rants. (Keep in mind there are many people on the jdk-dev alias, and a > lot of them may not care about this topic).
Agreed. Over a thousand people are subscribed to the jdk-dev list, which is meant for discussion of topics of the broadest interest. I suspect that many people would appreciate it if future discussions of this topic were confined to the security-dev list. > It is to the point where I > only skim your emails quickly. I would take the time to write up your > ideas in an external place. It may not go anywhere, but at least you > would have a single place where your proposal, experiments, etc are > documented. A fine suggestion. - Mark
