On Tue, 19 Oct 2021 14:34:25 GMT, Weijun Wang <[email protected]> wrote:
>> This fix improves the exception message to better indicate when the key (and
>> not the signature algorithm) is restricted. This change also includes a few
>> other improvements:
>>
>> - The constraints checking in `AlgorithmChecker.check()` has been improved.
>> If the `AlgorithmConstraints` are an instance of
>> `DisabledAlgorithmConstraints`, the internal `permits` methods are always
>> called; otherwise the public `permits` methods are called. This makes the
>> code easier to understand, and fixes at least one case where duplicate
>> checks were being done.
>>
>> - The above change caused some of the exception messages to be slightly
>> different, so some tests that checked the error messages had to be updated
>> to reflect that.
>>
>> - AlgorithmDecomposer now stores the canonical algorithm names in a Map,
>> which fixed a bug where "RSASSA-PSS" was not being restricted properly.
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/sun/security/util/AlgorithmDecomposer.java line
> 48:
>
>> 46: "SHA-384", "SHA384", "SHA-512", "SHA512", "SHA-512/224",
>> 47: "SHA512/224", "SHA-512/256", "SHA512/256");
>> 48:
>
> Do you want to support the "SHA" -> "SHA1" mapping?
These should be standard digest names as specified by the disabled algorithm
security property syntax. SHA is an alias.
> src/java.base/share/classes/sun/security/util/AlgorithmDecomposer.java line
> 196:
>
>> 194: static String canonicalName(String algorithm) {
>> 195: return CANONICAL_NAME.getOrDefault(algorithm, algorithm);
>> 196: }
>
> I'm not sure if `canonicalName` is good. Normally, we say "SHA-1" is the
> standard name but this method changes it to "SHA1".
Right, it's really just about using consistent message digest names so that it
can match for example, "SHA-1" and also "SHA1withRSA". I'll change the name to
something else.
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5928