On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 19:35:56 GMT, Weijun Wang <wei...@openjdk.org> wrote:

> Please review this enhancement and its 
> [CSR](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8279632). Two new options `-s 
> salt` and `-f` can be specified on the `ktab` command when adding entries.
> 
> I'm a little concerned about the compatibility risk described in the CSR, 
> i.e. the `-f` option is already used in `ktab -d` to force removing entries. 
> Hopefully not many people are writing their own wrappers on ktab that always 
> include the `-f` option. I do want to be consistent with the naming in the 
> MIT krb5 ktutil command.
> 
> Another thing worth mentioning is the 
> [KerberosKey:&lt;new&gt;(KerberosPrincipal principal, char[] password, String 
> algorithm)](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/3790e58090be25421e3e323eb29deea100b7608c/src/java.security.jgss/share/classes/javax/security/auth/kerberos/KerberosKey.java#L149)
>  constructor which always uses the default salt. For consistency, it looks 
> like a new constructor should be added that takes the salt string as a 
> parameter as well. However, I don't intend to add it as I cannot see a proper 
> usage for it. In fact, I now regret adding the constructor linked above.

I added myself to the CSR as reviewer. Made minor edits, re-ordered the command 
line option ordering based on the ordering mentioned in the description.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6991

Reply via email to