On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 17:13:46 GMT, Weijun Wang <wei...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> The enhancement adds two extra items in the `getSubjectAlternativeNames()` 
>> output for an OtherName.
>> 
>> It also fix several errors:
>> 1. In `OtherName.java`, `nameValue` should be the value inside `CONTEXT [0]` 
>> without the tag and length bytes.
>> 2. The argument in constructor `extClass.getConstructor(Object.class)` is 
>> suspicious. Maybe it meant `byte[]`.
>
> Weijun Wang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
> commit since the last revision:
> 
>   specifies the type of the 4th element

New commit pushed with a spec change and CSR is now in draft mode. Something 
worth mentioning:

1. I explicitly added "valid UTF8String..." to match the `catch (IOException)` 
line in the implementation, so if there's anything wrong parsing the value as a 
string then the byte array will still be there.
2. I feel a little uneasy of the new `if` and `otherwise` words inside 
parenthesis, especially the second one which seems out of nowhere. Please 
suggest better wording if possible.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/7167

Reply via email to