On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 19:00:47 GMT, Lance Andersen <lan...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Hi all,
>> 
>> Please review the attached patch to address
>> 
>> - That JarFile::getInputStream did not check for a null ZipEntry passed as a 
>> parameter
>> - Have Zip/JarFile::getInputStream throw a ZipException in the event that an 
>> unexpected exception occurs
>> 
>> Mach5 tiers1-3 runs are clean as are the TCK java.util.zip and java.util.jar 
>> test runs
>> 
>> Best
>> Lance
>
> Lance Andersen has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
> commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Return null when ZipEntry::getName is null

The updates changes to ZipFile/JarFile look okay. I don't have time to study 
the test too closely right now but it will need to include instructions on how 
to re-create the signed JAR that is stored in the byte array.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/7348

Reply via email to