On Tue, 3 May 2022 02:20:23 GMT, Xue-Lei Andrew Fan <xue...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Hi. Sorry, I should have brought this up earlier, but there is a jtreg test >> library to help with ensuring the GC runs, >> `test/lib/jdk/test/lib/util/ForceGC.java`. You might consider replacing the >> test code that runs/checks the GC with `ForceGC.await()`. > >> Hi. Sorry, I should have brought this up earlier, but there is a jtreg test >> library to help with ensuring the GC runs, >> `test/lib/jdk/test/lib/util/ForceGC.java`. You might consider replacing the >> test code that runs/checks the GC with `ForceGC.await()`. > > It looks like a graceful GC utility. There are also some other test cases I > committed that do no use ForceGC. I filed a [new > bug](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8286045), and will make the > update all together. Thank you. > @XueleiFan Did you check to make sure someone ran Mach5 and the results were > ok before integrating? If I'm right, Weijun made the test. Please let me know if there are mach5 testing failures. BTW, it would be nice if Mach5 testing could be supported to run in Github. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8136
