security-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: RFR: 8280363: Minor correction of ALPN specification in SSLParameters [v2] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8280363: Minor correction of ALPN specification in SSLParameters [v2] Xue-Lei Andrew Fan
  • Re: RFR: 8280363: Minor correction of ALPN specification in SSLParameters [v2] Xue-Lei Andrew Fan
  • Re: RFR: 8280363: Minor correction of ALPN specification in SSLParameters [v2] Sean Mullan
  • Integrated: 8280363: Minor correction of ALPN specification in SSLParameters Xue-Lei Andrew Fan
• RFR: 8279796: Fix typo: Constucts -> Constructs Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8279796: Fix typo: Constucts -> Constructs Iris Clark
  • Re: RFR: 8279796: Fix typo: Constucts -> Constructs Sergey Bylokhov
  • Re: RFR: 8279796: Fix typo: Constucts -> Constructs Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8279796: Fix typo: Constucts -> Constructs [v2] Weijun Wang
  • Integrated: 8279796: Fix typo: Constucts -> Constructs Weijun Wang
• Integrated: 8274811: Remove superfluous use of boxing in java.base Andrey Turbanov
• RFR: 8280122: SupportedGroupsExtension should output "named groups" rather than "versions" John Jiang
  • Re: RFR: 8280122: SupportedGroupsExtension should output "named groups" rather than "versions" Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8280122: SupportedGroupsExtension should output "named groups" rather than "versions" Xue-Lei Andrew Fan
  • Re: RFR: 8280122: SupportedGroupsExtension should output "named groups" rather than "versions" Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8280122: SupportedGroupsExtension should output "named groups" rather than "versions" Xue-Lei Andrew Fan
  • Re: RFR: 8280122: SupportedGroupsExtension should output "named groups" rather than "versions" Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8280122: SupportedGroupsExtension should output "named groups" rather than "versions" John Jiang
  • Integrated: 8280122: SupportedGroupsExtension should output "named groups" rather than "versions" John Jiang
• RFR: 8280010: Remove double buffering of InputStream for Properties.load Andrey Turbanov
  • Re: RFR: 8280010: Remove double buffering of InputStream for Properties.load Sergey Bylokhov
  • Re: RFR: 8280010: Remove double buffering of InputStream for Properties.load Andrey Turbanov
  • Re: RFR: 8280010: Remove double buffering of InputStream for Properties.load Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8280010: Remove double buffering of InputStream for Properties.load Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8280010: Remove double buffering of InputStream for Properties.load Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8280010: Remove double buffering of InputStream for Properties.load Sergey Bylokhov
  • Integrated: 8280010: Remove double buffering of InputStream for Properties.load Andrey Turbanov
• RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos Michael Osipov
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos prasad-bit
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos Prasadrao Koppula
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos Prasadrao Koppula
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos [v2] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos [v2] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos [v2] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos [v3] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos [v3] Michael Osipov
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos [v3] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos [v3] Michael Osipov
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos [v3] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos [v3] Michael Osipov
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos [v3] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos [v3] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos [v3] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos [v3] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos [v3] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos [v4] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos [v4] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos [v4] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos [v4] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos [v5] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos [v5] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos [v5] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos [v5] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos [v5] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos [v6] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos [v6] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos [v6] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos [v6] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos [v6] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos [v6] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos [v7] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos [v7] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos [v8] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos [v8] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos [v8] Michael Osipov
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos [v8] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos [v8] Michael Osipov
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos [v9] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos [v10] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos [v10] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos [v10] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos [v10] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos [v10] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos [v10] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos [v11] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos [v12] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos [v12] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos [v13] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos [v13] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos [v13] Joe Darcy
  • Integrated: 8279842: HTTPS Channel Binding support for Java GSS/Kerberos Michael McMahon
• RFR: 8279918: Fix various doc typos Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: 8279918: Fix various doc typos Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8279918: Fix various doc typos Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: 8279918: Fix various doc typos [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8279918: Fix various doc typos Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8279918: Fix various doc typos Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: 8279918: Fix various doc typos Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8279918: Fix various doc typos Lance Andersen
  • Re: RFR: 8279918: Fix various doc typos [v2] Jonathan Gibbons
  • Re: RFR: 8279918: Fix various doc typos Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8279918: Fix various doc typos Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: 8279918: Fix various doc typos Lance Andersen
  • Re: RFR: 8279918: Fix various doc typos Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: 8279918: Fix various doc typos [v2] Lance Andersen
  • Re: RFR: 8279918: Fix various doc typos Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8279918: Fix various doc typos Lance Andersen
  • Re: RFR: 8279918: Fix various doc typos Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: 8279918: Fix various doc typos [v2] Lance Andersen
  • Re: RFR: 8279918: Fix various doc typos Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8279918: Fix various doc typos [v2] Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: 8279918: Fix various doc typos [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8279918: Fix various doc typos [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8279918: Fix various doc typos [v2] Lance Andersen
  • Re: RFR: 8279918: Fix various doc typos [v2] Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: 8279918: Fix various doc typos [v2] Alexander Zvegintsev
  • Re: RFR: 8279918: Fix various doc typos [v2] Erik Gahlin
  • Re: RFR: 8279918: Fix various doc typos [v2] Jonathan Gibbons
  • Integrated: 8279918: Fix various doc typos Pavel Rappo
• RFR: 8278851: Correct signer logic for jars signed with multiple digestalgs Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8278851: Correct signer logic for jars signed with multiple digestalgs Sean Coffey
  • Re: RFR: 8278851: Correct signer logic for jars signed with multiple digestalgs Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8278851: Correct signer logic for jars signed with multiple digestalgs Sean Coffey
  • Re: RFR: 8278851: Correct signer logic for jars signed with multiple digestalgs Sean Coffey
  • Re: RFR: 8278851: Correct signer logic for jars signed with multiple digestalgs Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8278851: Correct signer logic for jars signed with multiple digestalgs Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8278851: Correct signer logic for jars signed with multiple digestalgs [v2] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8278851: Correct signer logic for jars signed with multiple digestalgs [v2] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8278851: Correct signer logic for jars signed with multiple digestalgs [v2] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8278851: Correct signer logic for jars signed with multiple digestalgs [v2] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8278851: Correct signer logic for jars signed with multiple digestalgs [v2] Sean Mullan
  • Integrated: 8278851: Correct signer logic for jars signed with multiple digestalgs Sean Mullan
• RFR: 8279903: Redundant modulo operation in ECDHKeyAgreement John Jiang
  • Re: RFR: 8279903: Redundant modulo operation in ECDHKeyAgreement [v2] John Jiang
  • Re: RFR: 8279903: Redundant modulo operation in ECDHKeyAgreement [v2] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8279903: Redundant modulo operation in ECDHKeyAgreement [v2] Xue-Lei Andrew Fan
  • Integrated: 8279903: Redundant modulo operation in ECDHKeyAgreement John Jiang
• RFR: 8273236: keytool does not accurately warn about algorithms that are disabled but have additional constraints Hai-May Chao
  • Re: RFR: 8273236: keytool does not accurately warn about algorithms that are disabled but have additional constraints Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8273236: keytool does not accurately warn about algorithms that are disabled but have additional constraints [v2] Hai-May Chao
  • Re: RFR: 8273236: keytool does not accurately warn about algorithms that are disabled but have additional constraints [v2] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8273236: keytool does not accurately warn about algorithms that are disabled but have additional constraints [v4] Hai-May Chao
  • Re: RFR: 8273236: keytool does not accurately warn about algorithms that are disabled but have additional constraints Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8273236: keytool does not accurately warn about algorithms that are disabled but have additional constraints [v2] Hai-May Chao
  • Re: RFR: 8273236: keytool does not accurately warn about algorithms that are disabled but have additional constraints [v2] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8273236: keytool does not accurately warn about algorithms that are disabled but have additional constraints [v2] Hai-May Chao
  • Re: RFR: 8273236: keytool does not accurately warn about algorithms that are disabled but have additional constraints [v2] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8273236: keytool does not accurately warn about algorithms that are disabled but have additional constraints [v3] Hai-May Chao
  • Re: RFR: 8273236: keytool does not accurately warn about algorithms that are disabled but have additional constraints [v4] Hai-May Chao
  • Re: RFR: 8273236: keytool does not accurately warn about algorithms that are disabled but have additional constraints [v4] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8273236: keytool does not accurately warn about algorithms that are disabled but have additional constraints [v4] Hai-May Chao
  • Re: RFR: 8273236: keytool does not accurately warn about algorithms that are disabled but have additional constraints [v4] Hai-May Chao
  • Re: RFR: 8273236: keytool does not accurately warn about algorithms that are disabled but have additional constraints [v5] Hai-May Chao
  • Re: RFR: 8273236: keytool does not accurately warn about algorithms that are disabled but have additional constraints [v5] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8273236: keytool does not accurately warn about algorithms that are disabled but have additional constraints [v5] Hai-May Chao
  • Re: RFR: 8273236: keytool does not accurately warn about algorithms that are disabled but have additional constraints [v5] Hai-May Chao
  • Re: RFR: 8273236: keytool does not accurately warn about algorithms that are disabled but have additional constraints [v5] Hai-May Chao
  • Re: RFR: 8273236: keytool does not accurately warn about algorithms that are disabled but have additional constraints [v6] Hai-May Chao
  • Re: RFR: 8273236: keytool does not accurately warn about algorithms that are disabled but have additional constraints [v7] Hai-May Chao
  • Re: RFR: 8273236: keytool does not accurately warn about algorithms that are disabled but have additional constraints [v7] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8273236: keytool does not accurately warn about algorithms that are disabled but have additional constraints [v7] Hai-May Chao
  • Re: RFR: 8273236: keytool does not accurately warn about algorithms that are disabled but have additional constraints [v7] Hai-May Chao
  • Re: RFR: 8273236: keytool does not accurately warn about algorithms that are disabled but have additional constraints [v8] Hai-May Chao
  • Integrated: 8273236: keytool does not accurately warn about algorithms that are disabled but have additional constraints Hai-May Chao
• RFR: 8279800: isAssignableFrom checks in AlgorithmParametersSpi.engineGetParameterSpec appear to be backwards Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8279800: isAssignableFrom checks in AlgorithmParametersSpi.engineGetParameterSpec appear to be backwards Xue-Lei Andrew Fan
  • Re: RFR: 8279800: isAssignableFrom checks in AlgorithmParametersSpi.engineGetParameterSpec appear to be backwards Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8279800: isAssignableFrom checks in AlgorithmParametersSpi.engineGetParameterSpec appear to be backwards Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8279800: isAssignableFrom checks in AlgorithmParametersSpi.engineGetParameterSpec appear to be backwards Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8279800: isAssignableFrom checks in AlgorithmParametersSpi.engineGetParameterSpec appear to be backwards Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8279800: isAssignableFrom checks in AlgorithmParametersSpi.engineGetParameterSpec appear to be backwards Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8279800: isAssignableFrom checks in AlgorithmParametersSpi.engineGetParameterSpec appear to be backwards Xue-Lei Andrew Fan
  • Re: RFR: 8279800: isAssignableFrom checks in AlgorithmParametersSpi.engineGetParameterSpec appear to be backwards [v2] Xue-Lei Andrew Fan
  • Re: RFR: 8279800: isAssignableFrom checks in AlgorithmParametersSpi.engineGetParameterSpec appear to be backwards Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8279800: isAssignableFrom checks in AlgorithmParametersSpi.engineGetParameterSpec appear to be backwards Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8279800: isAssignableFrom checks in AlgorithmParametersSpi.engineGetParameterSpec appear to be backwards Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8279800: isAssignableFrom checks in AlgorithmParametersSpi.engineGetParameterSpec appear to be backwards [v2] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8279800: isAssignableFrom checks in AlgorithmParametersSpi.engineGetParameterSpec appear to be backwards [v2] Xue-Lei Andrew Fan
  • Re: RFR: 8279800: isAssignableFrom checks in AlgorithmParametersSpi.engineGetParameterSpec appear to be backwards [v2] Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8279800: isAssignableFrom checks in AlgorithmParametersSpi.engineGetParameterSpec appear to be backwards Weijun Wang
  • Integrated: 8279800: isAssignableFrom checks in AlgorithmParametersSpi.engineGetParameterSpec appear to be backwards Weijun Wang
• RFR: 8279801: EC KeyFactory and KeyPairGenerator do not have aliases for OID format Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8279801: EC KeyFactory and KeyPairGenerator do not have aliases for OID format Xue-Lei Andrew Fan
  • Re: RFR: 8279801: EC KeyFactory and KeyPairGenerator do not have aliases for OID format Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8279801: EC KeyFactory and KeyPairGenerator do not have aliases for OID format Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8279801: EC KeyFactory and KeyPairGenerator do not have aliases for OID format Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8279801: EC KeyFactory and KeyPairGenerator do not have aliases for OID format Valerie Peng
  • Integrated: 8279801: EC KeyFactory and KeyPairGenerator do not have aliases for OID format Weijun Wang
• Integrated: Merge jdk18 Jesper Wilhelmsson
  • Integrated: Merge jdk18 Jesper Wilhelmsson
• Integrated: 8274809: Update java.base classes to use try-with-resources Andrey Turbanov
• Integrated: 8274679: Remove unnecessary conversion to String in security code in java.base Andrey Turbanov
• JEP 411: sandboxing use case Olivier Cailloux

• Earlier messages
• Later messages