security-dev  

Messages by Thread

• Re: RFR: 8244202: Implementation of JEP 418: Internet-Address Resolution SPI [v13] Aleksei Efimov
• Integrated: 8267108: Alternate Subject.getSubject and doAs APIs that do not depend on Security Manager APIs Weijun Wang
• RFR: 8276863: Remove test/jdk/sun/security/ec/ECDSAJavaVerify.java Weijun Wang
  • Integrated: 8276863: Remove test/jdk/sun/security/ec/ECDSAJavaVerify.java Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8276863: Remove test/jdk/sun/security/ec/ECDSAJavaVerify.java Anthony Scarpino
• RFR: 8276677: Malformed Javadoc inline tags in JDK source in javax/net/ssl Bradford Wetmore
  • Re: RFR: 8276677: Malformed Javadoc inline tags in JDK source in javax/net/ssl Jamil Nimeh
  • Integrated: 8276677: Malformed Javadoc inline tags in JDK source in javax/net/ssl Bradford Wetmore
• RFR: 8275887: jarsigner prints invalid digest/signature algorithm warnings if keysize is weak/disabled Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8275887: jarsigner prints invalid digest/signature algorithm warnings if keysize is weak/disabled Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8275887: jarsigner prints invalid digest/signature algorithm warnings if keysize is weak/disabled Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8275887: jarsigner prints invalid digest/signature algorithm warnings if keysize is weak/disabled [v2] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8275887: jarsigner prints invalid digest/signature algorithm warnings if keysize is weak/disabled [v2] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8275887: jarsigner prints invalid digest/signature algorithm warnings if keysize is weak/disabled Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8275887: jarsigner prints invalid digest/signature algorithm warnings if keysize is weak/disabled [v2] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8275887: jarsigner prints invalid digest/signature algorithm warnings if keysize is weak/disabled [v2] Weijun Wang
  • Integrated: 8275887: jarsigner prints invalid digest/signature algorithm warnings if keysize is weak/disabled Sean Mullan
• Re: RFR: 8275063: Implementation of Foreign Function & Memory API (Second incubator) [v22] Maurizio Cimadamore
• Re: RFR: 8275063: Implementation of Foreign Function & Memory API (Second incubator) [v21] Maurizio Cimadamore
• Re: RFR: 8275063: Implementation of Foreign Function & Memory API (Second incubator) [v20] Maurizio Cimadamore
• Re: RFR: 8275063: Implementation of Foreign Function & Memory API (Second incubator) [v19] Maurizio Cimadamore
• Re: RFR: 8275063: Implementation of Foreign Function & Memory API (Second incubator) [v18] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8275063: Implementation of Foreign Function & Memory API (Second incubator) [v18] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8275063: Implementation of Foreign Function & Memory API (Second incubator) [v18] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8275063: Implementation of Foreign Function & Memory API (Second incubator) [v18] Jorn Vernee
• Re: RFR: 8267108: Alternate Subject.getSubject and doAs APIs that do not depend on Security Manager APIs [v5] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8267108: Alternate Subject.getSubject and doAs APIs that do not depend on Security Manager APIs [v5] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8267108: Alternate Subject.getSubject and doAs APIs that do not depend on Security Manager APIs [v5] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8267108: Alternate Subject.getSubject and doAs APIs that do not depend on Security Manager APIs [v5] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8267108: Alternate Subject.getSubject and doAs APIs that do not depend on Security Manager APIs [v5] Chapman Flack
  • Re: RFR: 8267108: Alternate Subject.getSubject and doAs APIs that do not depend on Security Manager APIs [v5] Weijun Wang
• Re: RFR: 8225181: KeyStore should have a getAttributes method [v4] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8225181: KeyStore should have a getAttributes method [v4] Weijun Wang
• RFR: 8276632: Use blessed modifier order in security-libs code Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8276632: Use blessed modifier order in security-libs code [v2] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8276632: Use blessed modifier order in security-libs code [v2] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8276632: Use blessed modifier order in security-libs code [v2] Sean Mullan
  • Integrated: 8276632: Use blessed modifier order in security-libs code Magnus Ihse Bursie
• RFR: 8273977: Reduce unnecessary BadPaddingExceptions in RSAPadding Lari Hotari
  • Re: RFR: 8273977: Reduce unnecessary BadPaddingExceptions in RSAPadding Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8273977: Reduce unnecessary BadPaddingExceptions in RSAPadding Lari Hotari
  • Re: RFR: 8273977: Reduce unnecessary BadPaddingExceptions in RSAPadding Lari Hotari
  • Re: RFR: 8273977: Reduce unnecessary BadPaddingExceptions in RSAPadding Dalibor Topic
  • Re: RFR: 8273977: Reduce unnecessary BadPaddingExceptions in RSAPadding Lari Hotari
  • Re: RFR: 8273977: Reduce unnecessary BadPaddingExceptions in RSAPadding Xue-Lei Andrew Fan
  • Re: RFR: 8273977: Reduce unnecessary BadPaddingExceptions in RSAPadding Lari Hotari
  • Re: RFR: 8273977: Reduce unnecessary BadPaddingExceptions in RSAPadding Michael StJohns
  • Re: RFR: 8273977: Reduce unnecessary BadPaddingExceptions in RSAPadding Michael StJohns
  • Withdrawn: 8273977: Reduce unnecessary BadPaddingExceptions in RSAPadding duke
• Re: RFR: 8275063: Implementation of Foreign Function & Memory API (Second incubator) [v17] Maurizio Cimadamore
• Re: RFR: 8274524: SSLSocket.close() hangs if it is called during the ssl handshake [v3] Alexey Bakhtin
  • Re: RFR: 8274524: SSLSocket.close() hangs if it is called during the ssl handshake [v3] Alexey Bakhtin
• Re: RFR: 8274524: SSLSocket.close() hangs if it is called during the ssl handshake [v4] Alexey Bakhtin
  • Re: RFR: 8274524: SSLSocket.close() hangs if it is called during the ssl handshake [v4] Alexey Bakhtin
  • Re: RFR: 8274524: SSLSocket.close() hangs if it is called during the ssl handshake [v4] Xue-Lei Andrew Fan
  • Re: RFR: 8274524: SSLSocket.close() hangs if it is called during the ssl handshake [v4] Alexey Bakhtin
  • Re: RFR: 8274524: SSLSocket.close() hangs if it is called during the ssl handshake [v4] Xue-Lei Andrew Fan
  • Re: RFR: 8274524: SSLSocket.close() hangs if it is called during the ssl handshake [v4] Alexey Bakhtin
• Re: RFR: 8231107: Allow store password to be null when saving a PKCS12 KeyStore [v4] Weijun Wang
• Re: RFR: 8225181: KeyStore should have a getAttributes method [v3] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8225181: KeyStore should have a getAttributes method [v3] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8225181: KeyStore should have a getAttributes method [v3] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8225181: KeyStore should have a getAttributes method [v3] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8225181: KeyStore should have a getAttributes method [v3] Weijun Wang
• Re: RFR: 8244202: Implementation of JEP 418: Internet-Address Resolution SPI [v12] Aleksei Efimov
  • Re: RFR: 8244202: Implementation of JEP 418: Internet-Address Resolution SPI [v12] Chris Hegarty
• Re: RFR: 8275063: Implementation of Foreign Function & Memory API (Second incubator) [v16] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8275063: Implementation of Foreign Function & Memory API (Second incubator) [v16] Jorn Vernee
• Re: RFR: 8244202: Implementation of JEP 418: Internet-Address Resolution SPI [v11] Aleksei Efimov
• Re: RFR: 8275063: Implementation of Foreign Function & Memory API (Second incubator) [v15] Maurizio Cimadamore
• RFR: 8276401: Use blessed modifier order in java.net.http Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8276401: Use blessed modifier order in java.net.http Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: 8276401: Use blessed modifier order in java.net.http Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8276401: Use blessed modifier order in java.net.http Mark Sheppard
  • Re: RFR: 8276401: Use blessed modifier order in java.net.http Mark Sheppard
  • Integrated: 8276401: Use blessed modifier order in java.net.http Daniel Fuchs
• Re: RFR: 8275811 Incorrect instance to dispose [v6] Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8275811 Incorrect instance to dispose [v6] Xue-Lei Andrew Fan
  • Re: RFR: 8275811 Incorrect instance to dispose [v6] Xue-Lei Andrew Fan
• Re: RFR: 8275063: Implementation of Foreign Function & Memory API (Second incubator) [v14] Maurizio Cimadamore
• Re: RFR: 8275063: Implementation of Foreign Function & Memory API (Second incubator) [v13] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8275063: Implementation of Foreign Function & Memory API (Second incubator) [v13] Alan Bateman
• RFR: 8276348: Use blessed modifier order in java.base Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: 8276348: Use blessed modifier order in java.base Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: 8276348: Use blessed modifier order in java.base Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8276348: Use blessed modifier order in java.base Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8276348: Use blessed modifier order in java.base Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8276348: Use blessed modifier order in java.base Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: 8276348: Use blessed modifier order in java.base Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: 8276348: Use blessed modifier order in java.base Mark Sheppard
  • Re: RFR: 8276348: Use blessed modifier order in java.base Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8276348: Use blessed modifier order in java.base Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: 8276348: Use blessed modifier order in java.base Martin Buchholz
  • Re: RFR: 8276348: Use blessed modifier order in java.base Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: 8276348: Use blessed modifier order in java.base Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8276348: Use blessed modifier order in java.base Iris Clark
  • Re: RFR: 8276348: Use blessed modifier order in java.base Phil Race
  • Re: RFR: 8276348: Use blessed modifier order in java.base Andrey Turbanov
  • Re: RFR: 8276348: Use blessed modifier order in java.base Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: 8276348: Use blessed modifier order in java.base Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: 8276348: Use blessed modifier order in java.base Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8276348: Use blessed modifier order in java.base Martin Buchholz
  • Integrated: 8276348: Use blessed modifier order in java.base Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: 8276348: Use blessed modifier order in java.base Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: 8276348: Use blessed modifier order in java.base David Holmes
• Re: RFR: 8225181: KeyStore should have a getAttributes method [v2] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8225181: KeyStore should have a getAttributes method [v2] Weijun Wang
• Re: RFR: 8275063: Implementation of Foreign Function & Memory API (Second incubator) [v12] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8275063: Implementation of Foreign Function & Memory API (Second incubator) [v12] Paul Sandoz
  • Re: RFR: 8275063: Implementation of Foreign Function & Memory API (Second incubator) [v12] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8275063: Implementation of Foreign Function & Memory API (Second incubator) [v12] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8275063: Implementation of Foreign Function & Memory API (Second incubator) [v12] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8275063: Implementation of Foreign Function & Memory API (Second incubator) [v12] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8275063: Implementation of Foreign Function & Memory API (Second incubator) [v12] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8275063: Implementation of Foreign Function & Memory API (Second incubator) [v12] Jorn Vernee
• Re: RFR: 8275811 Incorrect instance to dispose [v5] Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8275811 Incorrect instance to dispose [v5] Xue-Lei Andrew Fan
  • Re: RFR: 8275811 Incorrect instance to dispose [v5] Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8275811 Incorrect instance to dispose [v5] Xue-Lei Andrew Fan
  • Re: RFR: 8275811 Incorrect instance to dispose [v5] Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8275811 Incorrect instance to dispose [v5] Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8275811 Incorrect instance to dispose [v5] Xuelei Fan
• RFR: 8274736: Concurrent read/close of SSLSockets causes SSLSessions to be invalidated unnecessarily Jamil Nimeh
  • Re: RFR: 8274736: Concurrent read/close of SSLSockets causes SSLSessions to be invalidated unnecessarily Xue-Lei Andrew Fan
  • Re: RFR: 8274736: Concurrent read/close of SSLSockets causes SSLSessions to be invalidated unnecessarily [v2] Jamil Nimeh
  • Re: RFR: 8274736: Concurrent read/close of SSLSockets causes SSLSessions to be invalidated unnecessarily [v3] Jamil Nimeh
  • Re: RFR: 8274736: Concurrent read/close of SSLSockets causes SSLSessions to be invalidated unnecessarily [v3] Xue-Lei Andrew Fan
  • Re: RFR: 8274736: Concurrent read/close of SSLSockets causes SSLSessions to be invalidated unnecessarily [v4] Jamil Nimeh
  • Re: RFR: 8274736: Concurrent read/close of SSLSockets causes SSLSessions to be invalidated unnecessarily [v4] Bradford Wetmore
  • Re: RFR: 8274736: Concurrent read/close of SSLSockets causes SSLSessions to be invalidated unnecessarily [v4] Jamil Nimeh
  • Re: RFR: 8274736: Concurrent read/close of SSLSockets causes SSLSessions to be invalidated unnecessarily [v5] Jamil Nimeh
  • Re: RFR: 8274736: Concurrent read/close of SSLSockets causes SSLSessions to be invalidated unnecessarily [v5] Bradford Wetmore
  • Integrated: 8274736: Concurrent read/close of SSLSockets causes SSLSessions to be invalidated unnecessarily Jamil Nimeh
• Re: RFR: 8271566: DSA signature length value is not accurate in P11Signature [v2] Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8271566: DSA signature length value is not accurate in P11Signature [v2] Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8271566: DSA signature length value is not accurate in P11Signature [v2] Martin Balao
  • Re: RFR: 8271566: DSA signature length value is not accurate in P11Signature [v2] Martin Balao
  • Re: RFR: 8271566: DSA signature length value is not accurate in P11Signature [v2] Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8271566: DSA signature length value is not accurate in P11Signature [v2] Martin Balao
  • Re: RFR: 8271566: DSA signature length value is not accurate in P11Signature [v2] Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8271566: DSA signature length value is not accurate in P11Signature [v2] Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8271566: DSA signature length value is not accurate in P11Signature [v2] Martin Balao
  • Re: RFR: 8271566: DSA signature length value is not accurate in P11Signature [v2] Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8271566: DSA signature length value is not accurate in P11Signature [v2] Martin Balao
  • Re: RFR: 8271566: DSA signature length value is not accurate in P11Signature [v2] Martin Balao
• Re: RFR: 8275063: Implementation of Foreign Function & Memory API (Second incubator) [v11] Maurizio Cimadamore
• Re: RFR: 8275811 Incorrect instance to dispose Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8275811 Incorrect instance to dispose Daniel Jeliński
• Re: RFR: 8275811 Incorrect instance to dispose [v4] Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8275811 Incorrect instance to dispose [v4] Xue-Lei Andrew Fan
  • Re: RFR: 8275811 Incorrect instance to dispose [v4] Daniel Jeliński
• Re: RFR: 8275063: Implementation of Foreign Function & Memory API (Second incubator) [v10] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8275063: Implementation of Foreign Function & Memory API (Second incubator) [v10] Paul Sandoz
  • Re: RFR: 8275063: Implementation of Foreign Function & Memory API (Second incubator) [v10] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8275063: Implementation of Foreign Function & Memory API (Second incubator) [v10] Paul Sandoz
  • Re: RFR: 8275063: Implementation of Foreign Function & Memory API (Second incubator) [v10] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8275063: Implementation of Foreign Function & Memory API (Second incubator) [v10] Jorn Vernee
• Re: RFR: 8274308: Improve efficiency for HandshakeContext initialization. Clive Verghese
• Re: RFR: 8274308: Improve efficiency for HandshakeContext initialization. [v2] Clive Verghese
  • Re: RFR: 8274308: Improve efficiency for HandshakeContext initialization. [v2] Xue-Lei Andrew Fan
  • Re: RFR: 8274308: Improve efficiency for HandshakeContext initialization. [v2] Clive Verghese
  • Re: RFR: 8274308: Improve efficiency for HandshakeContext initialization. [v2] Xue-Lei Andrew Fan
  • Re: RFR: 8274308: Improve efficiency for HandshakeContext initialization. [v2] Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8274308: Improve efficiency for HandshakeContext initialization. [v2] Xue-Lei Andrew Fan
  • Re: RFR: 8274308: Improve efficiency for HandshakeContext initialization. [v2] Clive Verghese
  • Re: RFR: 8274308: Improve efficiency for HandshakeContext initialization. [v2] Xue-Lei Andrew Fan
  • Re: RFR: 8274308: Improve efficiency for HandshakeContext initialization. [v2] Clive Verghese
• Re: RFR: 8244202: Implementation of JEP 418: Internet-Address Resolution SPI [v9] Aleksei Efimov
• Re: RFR: 8244202: Implementation of JEP 418: Internet-Address Resolution SPI [v10] Aleksei Efimov
  • Re: RFR: 8244202: Implementation of JEP 418: Internet-Address Resolution SPI [v10] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8244202: Implementation of JEP 418: Internet-Address Resolution SPI [v10] Michael McMahon
• Integrated: 8251468: X509Certificate.get{Subject, Issuer}AlternativeNames and getExtendedKeyUsage do not throw CertificateParsingException if extension is unparseable Sean Mullan
• Integrated: 8273026: Slow LoginContext.login() on multi threading application Larry-N
• Re: RFR: 8273101: Eliminate the usage of threadgroup sandboxing in the java.util.logging Sergey Bylokhov
  • Re: RFR: 8273101: Eliminate the usage of threadgroup sandboxing in the java.util.logging Mandy Chung
  • Re: RFR: 8273101: Eliminate the usage of threadgroup sandboxing in the java.util.logging Sergey Bylokhov
• Integrated: 8257722: Improve "keytool -printcert -jarfile" output Hai-May Chao
• Re: RFR: 8257722: Improve "keytool -printcert -jarfile" output [v5] Hai-May Chao
• Re: RFR: 8257722: Improve "keytool -printcert -jarfile" output [v3] Hai-May Chao
• Re: RFR: 8257722: Improve "keytool -printcert -jarfile" output [v4] Hai-May Chao
  • Re: RFR: 8257722: Improve "keytool -printcert -jarfile" output [v4] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8257722: Improve "keytool -printcert -jarfile" output [v4] Hai-May Chao
• Re: RFR: 8267108: Alternate Subject.getSubject and doAs APIs that do not depend on Security Manager APIs [v4] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8267108: Alternate Subject.getSubject and doAs APIs that do not depend on Security Manager APIs [v4] Chapman Flack
• previously prevented exploit now possible with JDK 18 Rick Hillegas
  • Re: previously prevented exploit now possible with JDK 18 Alan Bateman
  • Re: previously prevented exploit now possible with JDK 18 Rick Hillegas
  • Re: previously prevented exploit now possible with JDK 18 Sean Mullan
  • Re: previously prevented exploit now possible with JDK 18 Rick Hillegas
  • Re: previously prevented exploit now possible with JDK 18 Bernd Eckenfels
  • Re: previously prevented exploit now possible with JDK 18 Rick Hillegas
• Re: RFR: 8273026: Slow LoginContext.login() on multi threading application [v7] Larry-N
  • Re: RFR: 8273026: Slow LoginContext.login() on multi threading application [v7] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8273026: Slow LoginContext.login() on multi threading application [v7] Florent Guillaume
  • Re: RFR: 8273026: Slow LoginContext.login() on multi threading application [v7] Weijun Wang
• Post-JEP411 request: callAs(Supplier<Subject>) Re: RFR: 8267108: Alternate Subject.getSubject and doAs APIs that do not depend on Security Manager APIs [v4] Chapman Flack
• Re: RFR: 8273026: Slow LoginContext.login() on multi threading application [v5] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8273026: Slow LoginContext.login() on multi threading application [v5] Weijun Wang
• Re: RFR: 8273026: Slow LoginContext.login() on multi threading application [v6] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8273026: Slow LoginContext.login() on multi threading application [v6] Larry-N

• Later messages