> On Jul 13, 2022, at 2:20 PM, Michael StJohns <mstjo...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> On 7/13/2022 3:26 PM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
>> Is it possible make it in the application layer? For example, mapping
>> case-sensitive name to case-in-sensitive name before calling into the
>> standard KeyStore APIs. It may be not good to break the standards for
>> corner cases?
>>
>> Xuelei
>
> Hi Xuelei -
>
> It wouldn't actually be breaking the PKCS12 spec - the addition of more
> attributes is part of the standard.
I agreed it could not break PKCS12 spec. I referred to the friendlyName spec
in PKCS12. An additional attribute could be used for the case-in-sensitive
name support. But there is a need to define and support the attribute in the
KeyStore implementation, just as you described in your previous reply.
> Nor, given the CaseExactJKS implementation, would it be breaking the JDK
> spec AFAICT. There is this in the KeyStore javadoc:
>
>> Whether aliases are case sensitive is implementation dependent. In order to
>> avoid problems, it is recommended not to use aliases in a KeyStore that only
>> differ in case.
> The approach you suggest wouldn't work, because you couldn't store one key
> with "MikesKey" and another with "MIKESKEY" in the Keystore.
>
I did not meant to cover the case. It may be fine to use a map, in which
“MikesKey” may be mapped to “mikeskkey-1000100”, and MIKESKEY to
“mikeskkey-0000000”, or something else like you described below ("Mike" ->
"04mike8”).
Xuelei
> Hmm - let me rephrase that slightly. You could use this approach, but not in
> the way you suggested. Instead, you'd need a transform from a String to a
> unique string that you could use inside the key store. The actual alias
> within the keystore would be the unique string.
>
> One way of doing that: Lowercase the string. Prepend the string with a 2
> character length field. Post pend the string with a hex field of
> CEIL(length/16) characters, each hex character representing 16 bits that
> indicate the case of the string.
>
> e.g. "Mike" -> "04mike8"
>
> Just a thought - Mike
>
>>
>>> On Jul 13, 2022, at 4:38 AM, Ravi Patel8 <ravi.pat...@ibm.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> We have a customer who is having a security requirement. He wants to know,
>>> Is it possible to have case-sensitive support for PKCS#12? We referred the
>>> RFCs for PKCS#12. We found that PKCS#12 uses a case in-sensitive alias and
>>> the alias Name is mapped with friendlyName attribute, which is specified as
>>> "caseIgnoreMatch" as below.
>>>
>>> friendlyName ATTRIBUTE ::= {
>>> WITH SYNTAX BMPString (SIZE(1..pkcs-9-ub-friendlyName))
>>> EQUALITY MATCHING RULE caseIgnoreMatch
>>> SINGLE VALUE TRUE
>>> ID pkcs-9-at-friendlyName
>>> }
>>>
>>> The RFCs can be found here:
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7292
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2985#page-19
>>>
>>> The JKS key store(case in-sensitive alias) has a special version
>>> (CaseExactJKS) that uses case sensitive aliases.
>>> So similarly, Will it be acceptable to have a case sensitive version of
>>> PKCS#12 as CaseExactPKCS12 which will use case sensitive aliases?
>
>
