On Thu, 15 Sep 2022 12:58:57 GMT, Weijun Wang <[email protected]> wrote:
> This is not a fix for the bug itself, therefore I suggest either create a new > issue or create a subtask for this code change. Hi, this one is just for the better/more detailed exception . For the real issue we still have JDK-8293097 . > Also, how about we enhance the existing ThrowException function to include > the error code in the output as well. Sounds like a good idea. > Finally, with this change, do you have more clues on the "Access is denied" > problem? Still not 100% sure whats happening there, it might be related to some special properties or missing privileges of the user executing those tests. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10280
