On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 13:32:43 GMT, Sean Mullan <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Weijun Wang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> spec change, getAlgorithm
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/javax/crypto/KEM.java line 242:
>
>> 240: * shared secret as a key with algorithm being
>> "Generic",
>> 241: * the key encapsulation message, and optional
>> parameters.
>> 242: * The return value should not be {@code null}.
>
> "should" means it *could* still return null. I assume that is not what we
> want. Although I would be more inclined to only specify cases where null may
> be returned, and if it isn't mentioned, then it should be implied that null
> is not a legal return value. If in doubt, perhaps check with Joe/CCC for
> advice when you file the CSR.
>
> This general comment applies to the other return types in this API where you
> say "not null". I think you can omit those.
I do mean "must not be null". Maybe I can ask Joe directly.
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13256#discussion_r1166901173
