On Tue, 2 May 2023 21:43:19 GMT, Ferenc Rakoczi <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Implement support for Leighton-Micali Signatures (LMS) as described in RFC
>> 8554. LMS is an approved software signing algorithm for CNSA 2.0, with
>> SHA-256/192 parameters recommended.
>
> Ferenc Rakoczi has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> adding key translation, finally block, removing 24-byte LMOTS parameters
src/java.base/share/classes/sun/security/util/RawKeySpec.java line 30:
> 28: import java.security.spec.KeySpec;
> 29:
> 30: public class RawKeySpec implements KeySpec {
Nit, should be one space between `RawKeySpec` and `implements`.
src/java.base/share/classes/sun/security/util/RawKeySpec.java line 30:
> 28: import java.security.spec.KeySpec;
> 29:
> 30: public class RawKeySpec implements KeySpec {
Can you add some comments describing this class?
src/java.base/share/classes/sun/security/util/RawKeySpec.java line 31:
> 29:
> 30: public class RawKeySpec implements KeySpec {
> 31: final private byte[] keyArr;
Put `private` before `final`.
src/java.base/share/classes/sun/security/util/RawKeySpec.java line 33:
> 31: final private byte[] keyArr;
> 32: /**
> 33: * The sole constructor
Nit: add period at end of sentence and an empty line after this (before the
`@param`).
src/java.base/share/classes/sun/security/util/RawKeySpec.java line 37:
> 35: */
> 36: public RawKeySpec(byte[] key) {
> 37: keyArr = key.clone();
Does this need to be cloned if it is an internal class?
src/java.base/share/classes/sun/security/util/RawKeySpec.java line 41:
> 39:
> 40: /**
> 41: * Getter function
Nit: add period at end of sentence and an empty line after this (before the
@return).
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13691#discussion_r1186201989
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13691#discussion_r1186202683
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13691#discussion_r1186205743
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13691#discussion_r1186204113
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13691#discussion_r1186204543
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13691#discussion_r1186205020
