On Wed, 7 Jun 2023 20:55:55 GMT, Bernd <d...@openjdk.org> wrote: >> It does - I'll change the test to not have this potential failure mode. > > I think it’s fine (just wanted to make sure i understood the problem > correctly), especially with the fixed seed. You could just comment it with > „with this seed the first two invocations produce different material“ or > something like that?
Any random source should return different bytes when its `nextBytes` is called again. The major point here is when we see the same signature is generated, we can be sure the 2nd call to `initSign` does reinitiate the state of the random source inside to be exactly the same when the 1st `initSign` was called. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14273#discussion_r1222185021
