On Wed, 5 Jul 2023 18:11:41 GMT, Roger Riggs <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Pavel Rappo has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains six additional
>> commits since the last revision:
>>
>> - Merge branch 'master' into 8311170
>> - Be consistent with the rest of the change
>> - Fix reported bugs
>> - Add even more cases and tidy up
>> - More cases
>> - Initial commit
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/sun/security/util/BitArray.java line 72:
>
>> 70: * specified byte array. The most significant bit of {@code a[0]}
>> gets
>> 71: * index zero in the BitArray. The array must be large enough to
>> specify
>> 72: * a value for every bit of the BitArray, i.e. {@code 8*a.length >=
>> length}.
>
> The original `<=` was correct, the number of bits in the input array must be
> less than the requested length of the BitArray. The constructors also
> describe the length using `<=`; they all should be consistent.
Are you sure? I just checked lines 91-92 and I'd say the change looks correct.
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14738#discussion_r1253548582