On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 07:23:20 GMT, Matthias Baesken <mbaes...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> We sometimes run into the following error. This especially occurs when > running with fastdebug binaries and on Linux ppc64le machines. > Current timeout set in the test is 1 second. > > Server accepting: 315357614990101 > Server accepted: 315359219006041 > Client starting handshake: 315359228098300 > java.net.SocketTimeoutException: Read timed out > at java.base/sun.nio.ch.NioSocketImpl.timedRead(NioSocketImpl.java:278) > at java.base/sun.nio.ch.NioSocketImpl.implRead(NioSocketImpl.java:304) > at java.base/sun.nio.ch.NioSocketImpl.read(NioSocketImpl.java:346) > at java.base/sun.nio.ch.NioSocketImpl$1.read(NioSocketImpl.java:796) > at java.base/java.net.Socket$SocketInputStream.read(Socket.java:1096) > at > java.base/sun.security.ssl.SSLSocketInputRecord.read(SSLSocketInputRecord.java:489) > at > java.base/sun.security.ssl.SSLSocketInputRecord.readHeader(SSLSocketInputRecord.java:483) > at > java.base/sun.security.ssl.SSLSocketInputRecord.decode(SSLSocketInputRecord.java:160) > at java.base/sun.security.ssl.SSLTransport.decode(SSLTransport.java:111) > at java.base/sun.security.ssl.SSLSocketImpl.decode(SSLSocketImpl.java:1507) > at > java.base/sun.security.ssl.SSLSocketImpl.readHandshakeRecord(SSLSocketImpl.java:1422) > at > java.base/sun.security.ssl.SSLSocketImpl.startHandshake(SSLSocketImpl.java:455) > at > java.base/sun.security.ssl.SSLSocketImpl.startHandshake(SSLSocketImpl.java:426) > at SSLSocketCloseHang.doClientSide(SSLSocketCloseHang.java:149) > at SSLSocketCloseHang.startClient(SSLSocketCloseHang.java:320) > at SSLSocketCloseHang.<init>(SSLSocketCloseHang.java:246) > at SSLSocketCloseHang.main(SSLSocketCloseHang.java:232) > at > java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DirectMethodHandleAccessor.invoke(DirectMethodHandleAccessor.java:103) > at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:580) > at > com.sun.javatest.regtest.agent.MainWrapper$MainTask.run(MainWrapper.java:138) > at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:1570) > > Making the timeout dependent on the timeout factor would give us the chance > to influence the test on such slower setups. Hi Lutz, thanks for the review ! ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15912#issuecomment-1735602848
