On Thu, 7 Dec 2023 20:55:22 GMT, Weijun Wang <wei...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> test/jdk/sun/security/rsa/WithoutNULL.java line 27: >> >>> 25: * @test >>> 26: * @bug 8320597 >>> 27: * @summary RSA signature verification fails on signed data that does >>> not encode params correctly >> >> The summary seems to contradict the check on line 52? Maybe: Verify RSA >> signature with omitted digest params (should be encoded as NULL) for >> backward compatibility? >> Rest looks good. > > Oh, this is the title of the bug which described what was wrong, and I often > simply copy this as the summary of a bug. You mean here I should emphasis > what is corrected and the updated behavior? You are right. According to the [jtreg FAQ](https://openjdk.org/jtreg/faq.html): > The @summary tag describes the condition that is checked by the test... Note > that a test summary is generally not the same thing as a Bugtraq synopsis, > since the latter describes the bug rather than the condition that the bug > violates. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17002#discussion_r1419659148
