On Wed, 3 Jan 2024 20:41:06 GMT, Weijun Wang <wei...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> `KEM.getInstance` now checks if the implementation is from a signed provider > if it's not builtin to JDK. > > Several adjustments to the test: > 1. Put one impl in `SunEC` to pretend it's builtin. This is necessary to test > for provider selection. > 2. When there is no need to choose a provider, use reflection to create a > `KEM` object that bypasses the `getInstance` call. src/java.base/share/classes/javax/crypto/KEM.java line 545: > 543: List<Provider.Service> allowed = new ArrayList<>(); > 544: for (Provider.Service s : list) { > 545: if (!JceSecurity.canUseProvider(s.getProvider())) { Is there a test that verifies a provider won't be used if it's not signed? Should there also be a test that verifies that a provider signed with an unknown key is rejected? ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17253#discussion_r1441779736