On Mon, 5 Aug 2024 18:00:08 GMT, Sean Mullan <mul...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Not sure. Maybe your sentence is OK. > > I agree that this might lead to some question as to whether a `derive` method > can be called concurrently. I think we should just remove this sentence. I > think one should assume a method can be called more than once without saying > that. If there was some reason this method could not be called more than > once, then it should throw `IllegalStateException` or some such similar > exception. > > If you still feel like you want to emphasize the method can be called more > than once, I would add it to the example in the class description. I don't see the need to emphasize the method can be called more than once... Is there any other JDK class which does this? ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20301#discussion_r1716069044
