On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 20:50:18 GMT, Sean Mullan <mul...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> > Added a _Specification_ change to the CSR so the _Generic_ name is added to > > the Standard Names document. > > I think this should be done as a separate issue. By adding this to the CSR, > this Enhancement means it is now of SE scope. I would rather this remain as > JDK scope. It is better to keep SE and JDK scope changes separate, especially > if we ever backport this, it will be smoother if it is of JDK scope. Are you okay if we create a separated PR to have _Generic_ first and we make the HKDF PR depend on that? We are not planning to backport HKDF but any backport can remove the affected part in the test and avoid an SE change as dependency. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22215#issuecomment-2555766218
