This fix addresses a performance regression found on some aarch64 processors, namely the Apple M1, when we moved to a quarter round parallel implementation in JDK-8349106. After making some improvements in the ordering of the instructions in the 20-round loop we found that going back to a block-parallel implementation was faster, but it definitely needed the ordering changes for that to be the case. More importantly, the block parallel implementation with the interleaving turns out to be faster on even those processors that showed improvements when moving to the quarter round parallel implementation.
There is a spreadsheet attached to the JBS bug that shows 3 different implementations relative to the current (QR-parallel with no interleaving) implementation on 3 different ARM64 processors. Comparative benchmarks can also be found below. ------------- Commit messages: - 8350126: Regression ~3% on Crypto-ChaCha20Poly1305.encrypt for MacOSX aarch64 Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24420/files Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=24420&range=00 Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8350126 Stats: 488 lines in 3 files changed: 238 ins; 214 del; 36 mod Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24420.diff Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/24420/head:pull/24420 PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24420
