On Tue, 27 May 2025 11:50:14 GMT, Per Minborg <pminb...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> This PR proposes to use `JavaNioAccess::getBufferAdress` rather than >> `DirectBuffer::address` so that `Buffer` instances backed by MemorySegment >> instances can be used in classes that were not covered by >> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/25321 >> >> This PR passes tier1, tier2, and tier3 tests on multiple platforms and >> configurations. > > Per Minborg has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a > merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes > brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 13 additional > commits since the last revision: > > - Merge branch 'master' into jdk-segment-access > - Revert copyright year > - Revoke changes in WAFCI > - Address comments > - Fix copyright year > - Update after comments > - Update after comments > - Add tests > - Clean up > - Revoke changes in classes that is always using DirectBuffer > - ... and 3 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/5abc863c...1eb284df Marked as reviewed by alanb (Reviewer). ------------- PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25324#pullrequestreview-2870926691
